Proof carbon dating is wrong

posted by | Leave a comment

It is only useful for once-living things which still contain carbon, like flesh or bone or wood.

Rocks and fossils, consisting only of inorganic minerals, cannot be dated by this scheme.

That is until careful measurements revealed a significant disequalibrium. All the present C-14 would accumulate, at present rates of production and build up, in less than 30,000 years!His theory was that all living creatures have a constant proportion of radioactive and non-radioactive carbons in their body because they keep absorbing these elements from the environment.But as soon as the creature dies it stops absorbing these and sheds any trace of carbon-14 at a decay rate of 50 per cent every 5,700 years.Their work was detailed in a paper in the latest issue of the journal .For over 50 years, scientists and researchers have relied on carbon dating to find the exact age of organic matter.

Leave a Reply

  1. weston super mare dating 04-Feb-2017 02:20

    Just don’t take it too literally – web space can only unite two people for online communication, it can’t erase the distance between them.

  2. Free random sexchat 24-Apr-2017 11:55

    There is a major rest stop and parking area in the Town of Uppingham that is perfect for dogging if you are in to the swinging lifestyle.

  3. dating personals kingston idaho 10-Feb-2017 05:24

    Looks at the use of strategic and operational level communications (COMINT) and electronics (ELINT) intelligence.

sex dating in mount healthy ohio